Chuyên mục
1
Nội quy chung
Welcome to TES Community. If this is your first visit don’t forget to read the how to guide. Submit your first post here and let everyone know that another contributor has joined the Community. If you are looking for tips on how to post or need advice on the best place to submit your message, just ask away.
2
Hỗ trợ kĩ thuật
Here, teacher voice meets policymaking. This forum is dedicated to giving teachers and other education professionals the opportunity to have their say in the formation of education policy. Share your views here. Your thoughts today, could be the policy of tomorrow.
3
Môn tiếng Anh
Môn học tiếng Anh

Bài viết nổi bật trong ngày

Bài viết nổi bật của tháng

Thành viên trực tuyến

Anyone here actually made Dating Ads profitable?

So, I've been dipping my toes into online advertising lately, and one thing that really had me scratching my head was dating ads . You know, those banners and popups promoting dating platforms that seem to follow you around after one Google search? I used to scroll past them thinking they were all the same, but when I started exploring digital advertising myself, I wondered — can dating ads actually bring a profitable ROI, or is it just hype?
At first, I didn't think it was worth the effort. Dating feels like such a “crowded” niche — tons of competition, strict ad policies, and audiences that can be hard to target right. But curiosity got the better of me. I saw people in other forums talking about decent conversions and repeat users from dating platforms, so I decided to experiment a little with small ad budgets and see where it goes.
My first mistake: treating dating ads like any other campaign
When I started, I ran my dating ads the same way I would for, say, an e-commerce or fitness product — standard visuals, short headlines, and a call-to-action like “Sign Up Today.” Total flop. The CTR was barely noticeable, and my cost per click was eating into whatever I hoped to gain.
Then I realized something simple but important — dating ads need to feel personal . People respond to emotional cues, not just offers. It's not about “signing up” but about the possibility of connection. The moment I adjusted my messaging to something more relatable, like “Meet people nearby get you,” my engagement shot up noticeably.
Ad placement and timing really matter
Another thing I noticed after running a few tests: placement matters a lot . Dating ads that run late at night (especially between 9 PM to midnight) performed way better than during the day. I'm guessing it's because people scroll casually in the evenings when they're more open to connection or conversation.
Mobile ads also outperform desktop by a huge margin. It makes sense when you think about it — most people use dating platforms on their phones. So if your creative isn't optimized for mobile (portrait ratio, quick load times, and swipe-friendly visuals), you're basically wasting impressions.
Targeting: finding the sweet spot
I used to think broader targeting meant better chances, but that's not true here. Narrowing down by interests — like social activities, nightlife, or local meetups — makes a noticeable difference. You're not selling a “product,” you're offering an experience . So aligning your ad targeting to match that mindset really helps.
I also tried geo-specific targeting for urban areas versus small towns, and surprisingly, smaller cities converted better for me. People in those areas seemed more open to exploring online dating platforms than I expected.
Testing different ad styles
I tested a mix of ad formats — text-only, image-based, and short video ads. Here's what I found:
  • Text-only ads worked well for late-night mobile placements. They looked less like “ads” and more like casual posts, which made people click out of curiosity.
  • Visual banners with minimal text and a relatable face (no stock photos, just realistic ones) had solid engagement on apps and content networks.
  • Short videos were hit or miss, but when they worked, they really worked. Keeping it under 10 seconds with a quick emotional hook (“Feeling lonely tonight?”) helped.
That's when I stumbled upon this really helpful resource — A beginners guide on advertising dating platform . It explained in simple terms how to plan creatives, pick traffic sources, and measure ROI for dating-specific campaigns. It's not some over-the-top expert talk, just straightforward stuff that actually helped me fine-tune my approach.
My biggest learning: dating ads are about “moments,” not demographics
I used to obsess over age, gender, and location — but once I started focusing on timing and context , things clicked. Ads that felt emotionally relevant — like during holiday seasons, weekends, or just late evenings — had much stronger conversion signals. People engage when they're in the mood for connection, not when they're rushing through a workday.
Also, I learned not to chase immediate ROI. Dating ads build traction over time. You get users who might not sign up immediately but return later because they remember your ad or your platform's name. It's more like planting seeds than flipping quick profits.
So, was it profitable?
Honestly, yes — once I stopped treating it like a typical ad niche. The ROI wasn't massive at first, but it was steady . Once I figured out my audience rhythm and ad style, I saw consistent conversions with moderate ad spend. It's one of those niches where patience and testing really pays off.
If you're just starting out, my advice would be: don't copy big flashy campaigns. Keep your tone casual, your visuals genuine, and test small batches. Once you find that “sweet spot,” you'll realize that dating ads aren't just about selling — they're about understanding what people are feeling when they see your ad.
 
Top